Friday, February 10, 2017

Siege or Fire? None or Both?

Yes, I think that siege and total war are necessary because without them there would be even more deaths and even more casualties. I see why some people think that they are bad. Even if they are, they are necessary to win the war. Siege and total war were necessary to win the war.
Posted by at

9 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:51 AM

    I agree because they gotta do what they gotta do.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:51 AM

    I totally agree. It was not the best way to solve their problems but it was necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:52 AM

    I think that you are totally right in that they gotta do what they gotta do.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:53 AM

    I think that siege and total war weren't TOTALLY necessary, but they sometimes aren't very needed since they can be quite destructive like total war.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM

    I respectfully disagree because I think that it just brought more violence to the war.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM

    I disagree because without siege and total war there wouldn't be more casualties there would be less casualties because its not only affecting soldiers it's also affecting the citizens

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:55 AM

    I disagree because without siege and total war there wouldn't be more casualties there would be less casualties because its not only affecting soldiers it's also affecting the citizens

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:59 AM

    I respectfully disagree. I think that it hurt more people than necessary.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 12:00 PM

    I really agree and I think that your point is very clear. Nice going!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)