Friday, February 10, 2017

Siege and Total War - Is It Necessary?

Siege and total war is not necessary. I think this because the union shouldn't do anything they want to win this war, and they shouldn't have to hurt people and their property.  Also, what did the South do so wrong to them besides slavery? There should be a reason the union is burning everything, otherwise, it should not be necessary.
Posted by at

5 comments:

  1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:53 AM

    I think that your ideas are great, but it does not make sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:54 AM

      How does it not make sense??

      Delete
    2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:56 AM

      I agree with Jared I like the ideas but not everything can be settled silently.

      Delete
  2. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:56 AM

    I agree with Jared because people in the war couldn't get land by peacefully protesting, or the other team would just wreck their day. So, what i'm saying is that they shouldn't do total war but they shouldn't ever do a peaceful protest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousFebruary 13, 2017 at 11:57 AM

    I respectfully disagree with u Alani, the union had to get the union back. Of course I see your point, but I just don't think exactly what you think.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)